Wow, I know I shouldn’t be surpised, but seriously? John Kyl? SERIOUSLY? Citing statistics so grossly inaccurate as if they were true. A seasoned senator such as you should know better… or do they?
After all, facts are facts, and although we may quote one to another with a
chuckle the words of the Wise Statesman, “Lies – damned lies – and statistics,”
still there are some easy figures the simplest must understand, and the astutest
cannot wriggle out of. ~Leonard Courtney, speech, August 1895, New York, “To My
Fellow-Disciples at Saratoga Springs,” printed in The National Review
Hmmm, so we had this problem in 1895 as well. I guess politics leads people down the path of wanting to tell whatever story results in votes. No surprise there. What’s surprising is we let them. In 1895 maybe the media couldn’t fact check so rapidly, nor respond so broadly, but that’s no excuse today. We catch and respond in less than 24 hours.
In addition, there are facts and there are opinions, but opinions are never facts no matter how factually based. So let’s call it what it is, saying something not intended to be factual means you lied, intentionally. This isn’t just some “misinformation” euphemism (to go with many other euphemisms for lying we’ve used over the years) and it was not a mistake, he lied, and got caught. The question is what will done about it? Granted I like the Steven Colbert approach, but it isn’t likely to generate change in a meaningful way.
What we need is a system that doesn’t reward lying for votes with re-election. But that’s up to the “masses” and if history is any teacher, they are being failed by our education system and the uneducated are more likely to believe the lies, making this a tough problem to resolve. Which came first, the failed education or the lies?